"Accord" was one of the English catfighting magazines I waited on every month with bated breath.Hairpulling pictures and art, great stories - I purchased every edition and it's companion publication "Claws". However I wondered the connection of the magazine having half of its contents devoted to female combat and the other half to transvestism - men dressing as women.
Later I understood. If you become obsessed with catfighting over many years you will want to try it out for yourself - as a woman. My follow-up story can be viewed by googling: susan ondine catfight queen.
While I'm completely behind the you do you approach, the coupling of these issues has a more prosaic reason: since it existed in semi-legality, some players were sleazy. For example, postwar America's catfight and pinup photography couldn't come from established photographers as thanks to the wisdom of the crowd approach, McCarthyism coupled "sexually deviant behavior" with communism, so it came from those who took photos of minors wanting to make it big in Hollywood. Nude photos.
Even if they weren't sleazebags, transvestism was viewed as being gay, so for economic reasons, the magazines coupled issues not many would cover otherwise. Of course, when in the '70s SCOTUS paved the way to the legal side of the sexual revolution and big bucks came in, this coupling drifted apart. It's endearing how many young men today have the perception catfight and female wrestling is naturally acceptable.
Transvestism depends on how secure one feels about their manhood, and it doesn't change for catfights, otherwise, a lot of us would do it.