News:

PRODUCERS & OTHER FORUMS SITES: Please note - you MUST HAVE A RECIPROCAL LINK back to this site is you wish to ADVERTISE your site on this forum. If you do not have a link back to us, we will remove your posts with immiediate effect - 25th April 2010

Jemma v. Hollie

  • 19 Replies
  • 18516 Views
*

Offline HumiliationOne

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 497
Re: Jemma v. Hollie
« Reply #15 on: December 25, 2015, 06:09:03 AM »
I do not know what the rules were here so it is hard to determine how much Hollie was holding back. The fact that she secured that first rear naked choke so quick makes one wonder if she could have down that again.  She was no doubt calm, cool, and collected while Jemma was a full on wildcat.  It is very difficult for the smaller woman to win a fight if you do not allow chokes, scissors or strikes to the face.  No offense to Hollie fans but after the initial choke out, she took an ass whoopin here under these rules.

*

Offline extension

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 33
Re: Jemma v. Hollie
« Reply #16 on: December 25, 2015, 06:57:02 AM »

*

Offline jasonpistol

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 144
Re: Jemma v. Hollie
« Reply #17 on: December 25, 2015, 11:24:15 AM »

*

Offline j9764o

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 304
Re: Jemma v. Hollie
« Reply #18 on: December 25, 2015, 05:12:58 PM »
video 27mins on there before it goes off how long is the whole video
wrestling

*

Offline HumiliationOne

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 497
Re: Jemma v. Hollie
« Reply #19 on: December 25, 2015, 07:00:56 PM »
I was wondering if there was any more fighting too? Did Hollie win 2-0?  I love tough, tight and tiny fighters like Hollie.   Another great fight.  Does anyone know exactly what the rules are.  Face strikes looked legal here.