Thought I'd weigh in on this discussion. I've (mature male here for those who won't read my profile) Long, LONG time had an intense erotic thrill from the idea of two girls/women in a fight, of almost any sort. Probably started well before puberty when I watched a Roy Rogers TV show in which Roy's wife Dale Evans got into a fight with a "bad" woman associated with some sort of criminal enterprise and it had an arousing effect, even though I was well younger than puberty. Since then the thrill has only intensified. Multiple events have stimulated this "affliction."
I don't apologize for it but fully understand those who don't get it. My wife is one of them. I've twice, in over 40 years of marriage mentioned my interest in female vs female battles, which have now grown to include all sorts of erotic contests above and beyond the "catfight" scenarios that predominated early on. She was NOT impressed. Her notion followed along the lines of the original poster in this thread and assumed that it was my desire to "wish" her to be hurt. Nothing could be further from the truth. I do not wish any woman (or man for that matter) to be physically harmed in any way. But as others have already replied here, the emotional, mental, and physical challenge that permeates a titfight, catifght, fistfight, sexfight, stripfight, or other such encounter is immensely erotic for me. I've written many stories (novels to some) that reflect my deepest hidden desires. Can't help it. But to think that I WANT pain and hurt for the women (or men who might engage in the various forms of men vs men battles that are discussed in one of these forums) is simply not true. I want sincere engagement, full effort, will-to-win, and may the best woman win sort of encounter. If there is a bit of humiliation or brief pain involved, that goes with the territory, but no lasting damage.
My long-winded response, had to chip in.
I've read a few of your stories and thoroughly enjoyed them. Regardless if it's fetish writing or mainstream, I've long since observed that some views I hold as a private person differs from what I've learned as a writer (aka opting to disregard something). My attraction started way before puberty, and I can concur, it is hard to find a significant other who accepts that.
One reason for that is the dynamic of discussion between men and women. Quite often we tend to switch into defensive mode, attesting the truth that apart from the fantasies we're attracted to, we're actually not violent. While true, it doesn't address the bull in the china shop, namely the fact that while we should be in a place of fantasy where we can reinvent ourselves, women come with a survival kit. Based on experience, and unfortunately corroborated by some actions here, women can fully expect unsolicited advances, may the be verbal, or the more frequent visual ones.
Those, who send or ask nudes without even ever talking to other party are not people who take the wishes of others into consideration. It's also not helpful, if the talking peters out in mere insult as if a person is in constant trash talk mode.
The reason I started to write two long-form series is because of my discovery, that even though we are some sort of a minority, even within the fetish community, outside the now-defunct Cavalier Magazine, which even for its time only covered the US, we don't have an actual historiography. Though we all come from different walks of life, our fetish stories, bearing a heavy focus on sensuality, doesn't represent our different interests in life.
The Kansas City Bomber is by no metric a masterpiece, but for a fleeting second between 1971 and 1974, mainstream adopted stories, which weren't about homemakers, plain Janes, damsels in distress, but about women who pursued their own passion. Even the catfight outside the skating arena happened for a valid and understandable reason. They weren't mere objects of fantasy, and what women object to, rightfully so, is being degraded to a level where they have no say.
