Ridiculous. Everyone who voted for Watson (probably multiple times) NEEDS to provide a realistic scenario where the frail Emma Watson can beat a fit, solid and trained Gina Carano.
And why they need to do that?
This is fantasy land, so people can imagine all sorts of outcomes, no matter how strange or outrageous they are. This is not my sort of thing, but it is strange to demand people to adhere to some equal standards on a forum like this. Everybody has her/his own kink.
I made a poll with two options; who would win a street fight: A petite actress, or a well trained, professional MMA fighter twice the size of the actress.
Actually, if this is a street fight as opposed to a caged fight or something like boxing, then Emma has several realistic scenarios of how she would win. How? She just grabs a bottle, breaks it and stabs Gina's neck with it, Gina dies. Something like this happened many times in real life.
That's why it's advised to never take part in street fights, even if you're an elite fighter against some drunk.
But I naively thought people would vote for a realistic outcome if two real-life women squared off against one another.
Those "real-life women" are just characters for a fantasy like any other. So yes, your thoughts indeed were naive.
By the way, I voted for Gina, because I prefer realistic outcomes and that's how I usually vote. But you are unnecessary aggressive. People can vote anything they want for any reason they want.
